When the the iterator variable is declared automatically, it "inherits" the
const/non-const status from the argument. We don't need to cast a const
table to non-const. If we had a programming error and tried to modify the
string, the compiler could now catch this.
It seems that we try to create a new file, which fails with -ENOSPC, and we
later fail when reading a file with ENODATA. journal_file_open() will return
-ENODATA if the file is too short or if journal_file_verify_header() fails.
We'll unlink a file we newly created if we fail to initialize it immediately
after creation. I'm not sure if the file we fail to open is the one we newly
created and e.g. failed to create the arena and such, or if it's the file we
were trying to rotate away from. Either way, I think we should be OK with
with a non-fully-initialized journal file.
Failed to create rotated journal: No space left on device
Failed to write entry of 2 bytes: No space left on device
sd_journal_open_files(["/tmp/fuzz-journal-remote.vELRpI.journal"]) failed: No data available
Assertion 'IN_SET(r, -ENOMEM, -EMFILE, -ENFILE)' failed at src/journal-remote/fuzz-journal-remote.c:70, function int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *, size_t)(). Aborting.
oss-fuzz-39238: https://oss-fuzz.com/issue/4609851129462784
oss-fuzz reports timeouts which are created by appending to a very long strv.
The code is indeed not very efficient, but it's designed for normal
command-line use, where we don't expect more than a dozen of entries. The fact
that it is slow with ~100k entries is not particularly interesting.
In the future we could rework the code to have better algorithmic complexity.
But let's at least stop oss-fuzz from wasting more time on such examples.
(My first approach was to set max_len in .options, but apparently this doesn't
work for hongfuzz and and AFL.)
oss-fuzz-34527: https://oss-fuzz.com/issue/5722283944574976
The reallocation of memory and counter incrementation is moved from
the only caller to the function. This way the callers can remain oblivious
of the BootConfig internals.
In the documentation, using the term "managed" for both the RA flag and
the DHCPv6 mode is confusing because the mode is referred to as
"solicit" both in the official DHCPv6 documentation (see RFC 8415) and
in the WithoutRA option.
Furthermore, calling the other RA flag "other information" or "other
address configuration" is confusing because its official name is simply
"other configuration" (see RFC 4861 and RFC 5175) and it isn't used to
assign IP addresses.
Rewrite the documentation for DHCPv6Client and WithoutRA to make it
clear that getting the "managed" RA flag triggers the same kind of DHCP
request as WithoutRA=solicit, whereas getting the "other configuration"
RA flag triggers the same kind of DHCP request as
WithoutRA=information-request.
Plain strv_split() should not care if the strings contains backslashes
or quote characters. But extract_first_word() interprets backslashes
unless EXTRACT_RETAIN_ESCAPE is given.
I wonder how it's possible that nobody noticed this before. I think this
code was introduced in 0645b83a40.
Fixup for a5efbf468c: if $COLORTERM was set, we'd
unconditionally turn on colors, which is unexpected and wrong. It even breaks
our own tests when executed in gnome-terminal.
