This means that when those targets are built, all the sources are built again,
instead of reusing the work done to create libbasic.a and other convenience static
libraries. It would be nice to not do this, but there seems to be no support in
our toolchain for joining multiple static libraries into one. When linking
a static library, any -l arguments are simply ignored by ar/gcc-ar, and .a
libraries given as positional arguments are copied verbatim into the archive
so they objects in them cannot be accessed.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2157629/linking-static-libraries-to-other-static-libraries
suggests either unzipping all the archives and putting them back togather,
or using a linker script. Unzipping and zipping back together seems ugly.
The other option is not very nice. The linker script language does not
allow "+" to appear in the filenames, and filenames that meson generates
use that, so files would have to be renamed before a linker script was used.
And we would have to generate the linker script on the fly. Either way, this
doesn't seem attractive. Since those static libraries are a niche use case,
it seems reasonable to just go with the easiest and safest solution and
recompile all the source files. Thanks to ccache, this is probably almost as
cheap as actually reusing the convenience .a libraries.
test-libsystemd-sym.c and test-libudev-sym.c compile fine with the generated
static libs, so it seems that they indeed provide all the symbols they should.
if we lack privs to create device nodes that's fine, and creating
/run/systemd/inaccessible/chr or /run/systemd/inaccessible/blk won't
work then. Document this in longer comments.
Fixes: #4484
Before this, `signal_from_string()` accepts simple signal name
or RTMIN+n. This makes the function also accept RTMIN, RTMAX,
and RTMAX-n.
Note that RTMIN+0 is equivalent to RTMIN, and RTMAX-0 is to RTMAX.
This also fixes the integer overflow reported by oss-fuzz #8064.
https://oss-fuzz.com/v2/testcase-detail/5648573352902656
Let's simplify the code a bit. Let's reduce the number of redundant if
checks a bit, (i.e. if we want to check for equality with
VIRTUALIZATION_VM_OTHER there's no need to check for non-equality with
VIRTUALIZATION_NONE first). As a very welcome side-effect this means we
lose some lines of code and our level of indentation is reduced.
No changes in behaviour.
This extends the change done in b29f6480ec to other logging functions.
This actually fixes some bugs in callers of log_struct(), for example
config_parse_alias() called 'return log_syntax(..., 0, ...)' which could result
in a bogus non-zero return value.
Calls to log_object() and log_format_iovec() — which is only used by
server_driver_message() — appear correct.
Let's optionally translate BSD exit codes to error strings too.
My first approach on adding this was to turn ExitStatusLevel into a
bitmask rather than a linear level, with one bit for the various feature
bits. However, the exit code ranges are generally not defined
independently from each other, i.e. our own ones are defined with the
LSB ones in mind, and most sets are defined with the ISO C ones.
Hence, instead I changed the existing hierarchy of MINIMAL, SYSTEMD, LSB
with an alias of FULL == LSB, only slightly by seperating FULL and LSB
into two separate levels, so that there's now:
1. MINIMAL (only EXIT_SUCCESS/EXIT_FAILURE)
2. SYSTEMD (incorporating our own exit codes)
3. LSB (like SYSTEMD but adding in LSB service exit codes)
4. FULL (like FULL but adding BSD exit codes)
Note that across the codebase only FULL, SYSTEMD, and MINIMAL are used,
depending on context, how much we know about the process and whether we
are logging for debugging purposes or not. This means the LSB level
wouldn't really have to be separate, but it appeared careless to me to
fold it into FULL along with the BSD exit codes.
Note that this commit doesn't change much for regular codepaths: the
FULL exit status level is only used during debug logging, as a helper to
the user reading the debug logs.
Of course, alloca() shouldn't be used with anything that can grow
without bounds anyway, but let's better safe than sorry, and catch this
early.
Since alloca() is not supposed to return an error we trigger an
assert() instead, which is still better than heap trickery.
Previously we were a bit sloppy with the index and size types of arrays,
we'd regularly use unsigned. While I don't think this ever resulted in
real issues I think we should be more careful there and follow a
stricter regime: unless there's a strong reason not to use size_t for
array sizes and indexes, size_t it should be. Any allocations we do
ultimately will use size_t anyway, and converting forth and back between
unsigned and size_t will always be a source of problems.
Note that on 32bit machines "unsigned" and "size_t" are equivalent, and
on 64bit machines our arrays shouldn't grow that large anyway, and if
they do we have a problem, however that kind of overly large allocation
we have protections for usually, but for overflows we do not have that
so much, hence let's add it.
So yeah, it's a story of the current code being already "good enough",
but I think some extra type hygiene is better.
This patch tries to be comprehensive, but it probably isn't and I missed
a few cases. But I guess we can cover that later as we notice it. Among
smaller fixes, this changes:
1. strv_length()' return type becomes size_t
2. the unit file changes array size becomes size_t
3. DNS answer and query array sizes become size_t
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76745
We use MTUs all over the place, let's add a unified, strict parser for
it, that takes MTU ranges into account.
We already have parse_ifindex() close-by, hence this appears to be a
natural addition, in particular as the range checking is not entirely
trivial to do, as it depends on the protocol used.
If enabling controller for some reason fails we need to clear error
for the FILE stream. Enabling remaining controllers would otherwise
fail because write_string_stream_ts() checks for ferror(f) and returns
-EIO if there is one.
Broken by commit <77fa610b22>.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This drops a good number of type-specific _cleanup_ macros, and patches
all users to just use the generic ones.
In most recent code we abstained from defining type-specific macros, and
this basically removes all those added already, with the exception of
the really low-level ones.
Having explicit macros for this is not too useful, as the expression
without the extra macro is generally just 2ch wider. We should generally
emphesize generic code, unless there are really good reasons for
specific code, hence let's follow this in this case too.
Note that _cleanup_free_ and similar really low-level, libc'ish, Linux
API'ish macros continue to be defined, only the really high-level OO
ones are dropped. From now on this should really be the rule: for really
low-level stuff, such as memory allocation, fd handling and so one, go
ahead and define explicit per-type macros, but for high-level, specific
program code, just use the generic _cleanup_() macro directly, in order
to keep things simple and as readable as possible for the uninitiated.
Note that before this patch some of the APIs (notable libudev ones) were
already used with the high-level macros at some places and with the
generic _cleanup_ macro at others. With this patch we hence unify on the
latter.
A regression was introduced that caused the mtime of /etc/.updated
and /var/.updated to be the current time when systemd-update-done
ran instead of being copied from /usr.
This was nearly fixed, but due to fflush being called after mtime
was carefully set, it was overwritten with the current time.
Regression introduced in 872c403963
A fix was just missed in 39c38d773fFixes#8806
With the recent terminal_urlify() APIs we'll now sometimes generate
clickable link CSO sequences. Hence we should also be able to remove
them again from strings. This beefs up the logic to do so.
Follow-up for: 23b27b39d2
Quoting https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/8760#discussion_r183321060:
> When we originally added the errno patching we went for a "best of both
> worlds" approach, i.e. that we override errno if an error is specified, but
> if no error is specified (i.e. 0 is passed as error code) then we use the
> previously set errno, similar in style how plain `printf()` would do it. In
> retrospect I think we almost never purposefully made use of the second,
> i.e. the plain `printf()` logic, but we multiple times ran into this case
> accidentally and introduced a bug. Hence yes, it probably makes sense to
> switch this over, and consistently ignore the `errno` already set and always
> override it with the error passed in. The only problem I see with that is: I
> wonder if there might be a case or two lurking somewhere where we actually
> made use of the "best of both worlds" approach, and if so, if we can detect
> where... (But then again, even if there is, and we fail to find those cases,
> maybe that's not all bad, as it's just a few new bugs against probably fixing
> many more old and future bugs, if you follow what I mean).
I scanned our codebase, and found some bugs in the value passed to log_*_errno,
but no intentional cases of error=0 being passed.
We don't know what the container payload needs, hence default to a PATH
with both bin and sbin included, as well as / and /usr.
Follow-up for #8324Fixes: #8698
Newer terminals (in particular gnome-terminal) understand special escape
sequence for formatting clickable links. Let's support that to make our
tool output more clickable where that's appropriate.
For details see this:
https://gist.github.com/egmontkob/eb114294efbcd5adb1944c9f3cb5feda
The one big issue is that 'less' currently doesn't grok this, and
doesn't ignore sequence like regular terminal implementations do if they
don't support it. Hence for now, let's disable URL output if a pager is
used. We should revisit that though as soon as less added support for it
and enough time passed for it to enter various distributions.
Double newlines (i.e. one empty lines) are great to structure code. But
let's avoid triple newlines (i.e. two empty lines), quadruple newlines,
quintuple newlines, …, that's just spurious whitespace.
It's an easy way to drop 121 lines of code, and keeps the coding style
of our sources a bit tigther.
To indicate that the there're no more entries, these wrappers return false but
did leave the passed pointed unmodified.
However EOF is not an error and is a very common case so initialize the output
argument to NULL even in this case so callers don't need to do that.
Fixes: #8721
We check the same condition at various places. Let's add a trivial,
common helper for this, and use it everywhere.
It's not going to make things much faster or much shorter, but I think a
lot more readable
